What's actually running

Measured, not claimed.

“The code exists” is not the same as “it works”, and a website is the easiest place in the world to blur the two. Everything below was measured on real hardware on the date given, or it's marked as not working. There is no third category.

What comes next

Three slices, in order.

Each one has to reach a real person's hands before the next one starts. No horizontal layers, no half-built platform waiting for the rest of itself.

SLICE 01 · RUNNING

“Pour the old archive in, and find things”

Import raw strokes from reMarkable and Boox, not PNGs. Local index, full-text search across every notebook and device, batch processing of the backlog. Even the rough version beats what the whole industry ships.

SLICE 02 · PART RUNNING

“A scrawled map, cleaned up”

Export runs. A map read off your strokes leaves as a Mermaid block that renders in GitHub or Obsidian, and every page leaves as SVG, both inside the Markdown export. The hard half doesn't. Stroke-level semantics — which shape is a node, which is an edge — is the classifier whose first attempt scored zero, and re-layout, OPML and the benchmark all wait behind it.

SLICE 03 · PART RUNNING

“Don't forget what you promised”

Commitments run. Struck through on paper means done; the deadline is read from the words beside it and anchored to when you wrote them; who you promised it to comes from the same line. The audio half hasn't started — handwriting as the index into a meeting recording. One user has already built that by hand, which is the clearest signal there is.

Where this is heading, stated once and not sold as a slogan: the notebook is one input. An audio recorder is the second, with evidence behind it. The immutable archive underneath, and the MCP door on top of it, are what stay constant. A second input does not open until the first one works end to end.
Software pricing

Draft, and we'll say so.

Two pieces of evidence point in opposite directions and both are real: some of the people who want this most are furious about subscriptions, and yet 568,000 reMarkable owners pay a monthly fee. Which is true depends on who turns out to want this, which is exactly what the wishlist is for.

TierDraft priceWhoWhat's in it
Free$0AnyoneLocal import and search, one device, 200 pages
Personal$9/monthKnowledge workersUnlimited, every device, diagram rebuild, MCP
Pro$29/monthConsultants, solo lawyersCommitment extraction, meeting-audio index, batch export
Firm$49/seatPractices, 5 seats upEncryption, MDM/Intune, SSO, remote wipe, data residency, BAA, SOC 2
Two things we won't do: charge a subscription purely to unlock sync, that's the thing reMarkable customers resent most, and inheriting that resentment is a gift, and lock your data in. The 200-page free tier is a limit on volume, not on days, because the moment this product earns its keep is when you pour your old archive into it.

For scale: break-even is around 730 paying customers. Not a million users. reMarkable alone has roughly 600,000 people already paying for note software, 730 is 0.12% of that.