“The code exists” is not the same as “it works”, and a website is the easiest place in the world to blur the two. Everything below was measured on real hardware on the date given, or it's marked as not working. There is no third category.
Each one has to reach a real person's hands before the next one starts. No horizontal layers, no half-built platform waiting for the rest of itself.
Import raw strokes from reMarkable and Boox — not PNGs. Local index, full-text search across every notebook and device, batch processing of the backlog. Even the rough version beats what the whole industry ships.
Stroke-level semantics: which shape is a node, which is an edge, what was drawn first. Re-layout, export to Mermaid, SVG and OPML — and publish a benchmark for handwritten diagrams, because nobody has one.
Pull commitments and open loops out of the notes, so the archive stops being a graveyard. Handwriting becomes the index into your meeting recordings — one user has already built this by hand, which is the clearest signal there is.
Two pieces of evidence point in opposite directions and both are real: some of the people who want this most are furious about subscriptions, and yet 568,000 reMarkable owners pay a monthly fee. Which is true depends on who turns out to want this — which is exactly what the wishlist is for.
| Tier | Draft price | Who | What's in it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Anyone | Local import and search, one device, 200 pages |
| Personal | $9/month | Knowledge workers | Unlimited, every device, diagram rebuild, MCP |
| Pro | $29/month | Consultants, solo lawyers | Commitment extraction, meeting-audio index, batch export |
| Firm | $49/seat | Practices, 5 seats up | Encryption, MDM/Intune, SSO, remote wipe, data residency, BAA, SOC 2 |
For scale: break-even is around 730 paying customers. Not a million users. reMarkable alone has roughly 600,000 people already paying for note software — 730 is 0.12% of that.